<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Anesthesia Billing and Practice Management &#124; Anesthesia Resources &#187; Reimbursement</title>
	<atom:link href="http://anesres.com/category/reimbursement/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://anesres.com</link>
	<description>We get the job done. Our efforts go beyond industry standards and benchmarks.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 18:11:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Anesthesia&#8217;s Best Payors for 2011</title>
		<link>http://anesres.com/reimbursement/anesthesias-best-payors-for-2011/</link>
		<comments>http://anesres.com/reimbursement/anesthesias-best-payors-for-2011/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 17:52:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert Cox</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Reimbursement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anesres.com/?p=2482</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It can be difficult to determine which payor is the best payor because physicians often find benefits and drawbacks from each company. According to Medscape&#8217;s Insurer Ratings Report 2011, 54 percent of physicians say the level of payment is the most important factor in making a payor their best payor. Other important factors include that… <a href="http://anesres.com/reimbursement/anesthesias-best-payors-for-2011/">Continue reading &#187;</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It can be difficult to determine which payor is the best payor because physicians often find benefits and drawbacks from each company. According to Medscape&#8217;s <a href="http://www.medscape.com/features/slideshow/insurerreport" target="_blank">Insurer Ratings Report 2011</a>, 54 percent of physicians say the level of payment is the most important factor in making a payor their best payor. Other important factors include that the company is easy to do business with (15 percent) and the frequency of denials (13 percent).</p>
<p>The survey was sent to 307,000 physicians in the United States and gathered 10,214 respondents.<br />Here are the top two &#8220;best&#8221; payors indicated by physicians in different specialties. Overall, 29 percent of physicians reported Blues Plans as their best payor with Aetna a distant second, at 10 percent. <strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong>Anesthesiology</strong> voted for :</p>
<ol>
<li>Blues Plans: 21 percent  and</li>
<li>United Healthcare: 12 percent</li>
</ol>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://anesres.com/reimbursement/anesthesias-best-payors-for-2011/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>HHS Announces Intent to Delay ICD-10 Compliance Date</title>
		<link>http://anesres.com/billing-collections/hhs-announces-intent-to-delay-icd-10-compliance-date/</link>
		<comments>http://anesres.com/billing-collections/hhs-announces-intent-to-delay-icd-10-compliance-date/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 18:19:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert Cox</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Billing & Collections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CMS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reimbursement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HHS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[icd10]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anesres.com/?p=2438</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As part of President Obama&#8217;s commitment to reducing regulatory burden, Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen G. Sebelius today announced that HHS will initiate a process to postpone the date by which certain health care entities have to comply with International Classification of Diseases, 10th Edition diagnosis and procedure codes (ICD-10).  The final rule adopting… <a href="http://anesres.com/billing-collections/hhs-announces-intent-to-delay-icd-10-compliance-date/">Continue reading &#187;</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: left;" align="center">As part of President Obama&#8217;s commitment to reducing regulatory burden, Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen G. Sebelius today announced that HHS will initiate a process to postpone the date by which certain health care entities have to comply with International Classification of Diseases, 10th Edition diagnosis and procedure codes (ICD-10). </p>
<p style="text-align: left;">The final rule adopting ICD-10 as a standard was published in January 2009 and set a compliance date of October 1, 2013 &#8211; a delay of two years from the compliance date initially specified in the 2008 proposed rule.  HHS will announce a new compliance date moving forward.</p>
<p> &#8221;ICD-10 codes are important to many positive improvements in our health care system,&#8221; said HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius.  &#8220;We have heard from many in the provider community who have concerns about the administrative burdens they face in the years ahead.  We are committing to work with the provider community to reexamine the pace at which HHS and the nation implement these important improvements to our health care system.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://anesres.com/billing-collections/hhs-announces-intent-to-delay-icd-10-compliance-date/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Congress passes fee fix, avoids 27% physician pay cut</title>
		<link>http://anesres.com/legislation/congress-passes-fee-fix-avoids-27-physician-pay-cut/</link>
		<comments>http://anesres.com/legislation/congress-passes-fee-fix-avoids-27-physician-pay-cut/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 14:55:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert Cox</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CMS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reimbursement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[physician fee fix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[physician payments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SGR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SGR fix]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anesres.com/?p=2436</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Physicians are safe from the impending 27.4% cut to their Medicare payments set to hit March 1 thanks to Congress passing a temporary ‘doc fix’ Friday through the end of 2012. The vote to extend the payroll tax holiday bill and keep the current $34.0376 conversion rate through Dec. 31 comes on the heels of intense… <a href="http://anesres.com/legislation/congress-passes-fee-fix-avoids-27-physician-pay-cut/">Continue reading &#187;</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Physicians are safe from the impending 27.4% cut to their Medicare payments set to hit March 1 thanks to Congress passing a temporary ‘doc fix’ Friday through the end of 2012.</p>
<p>The vote to extend the payroll tax holiday bill and keep the current $34.0376 conversion rate through Dec. 31 comes on the heels of intense debate among Congress members as to whether preventing the pay cut was fiscally sound.  The $150 billion bill failed to include deeper cuts requested by GOP Congress members but remained largely budget neutral.</p>
<p>Congress originally approved a two-month fix that was set to expire Feb. 29. Once signed into law, the new fee fix will be good through Dec. 31.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://anesres.com/legislation/congress-passes-fee-fix-avoids-27-physician-pay-cut/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Health Insurance Claims Processing Errors on the Rise</title>
		<link>http://anesres.com/billing-collections/health-insurance-claims-processing-errors-on-the-rise/</link>
		<comments>http://anesres.com/billing-collections/health-insurance-claims-processing-errors-on-the-rise/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jun 2011 13:00:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert Cox</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Billing & Collections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reimbursement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anesres.com/?p=2112</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The rate of inaccurate claims payments increased last year among commercial health insurers, according to the American Medical Association’s annual National Health Insurer Report Card. Commercial health insurers had an average claims-processing error rate of 19.3 percent, a 2 percent increase from 2010, according to the AMA findings, which are based on a random sampling… <a href="http://anesres.com/billing-collections/health-insurance-claims-processing-errors-on-the-rise/">Continue reading &#187;</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The rate of inaccurate claims payments increased last year among commercial health insurers, according to the American Medical Association’s annual <a title="National Health Insurer Report Card" href="http://ama.pr-optout.com/ViewAttachment.aspx?EID=rhvBPIv6TFrQEnOBF28gCtPk2SYyYBLpoi8OPvOGHcE%3d" target="_blank">National Health Insurer Report Card</a>.</p>
<p>Commercial health insurers had an average claims-processing error rate of 19.3 percent, a 2 percent increase from 2010, according to the AMA findings, which are based on a random sampling of 2.4 million electronic claims in February and March.</p>
<p>The AMA estimates the increase in overall inaccuracy represents an extra 3.6 million in erroneous claims payments compared to last year and adds $1.5 billion in unnecessary administrative costs. Eliminating health insurer claim payment errors would save $17 billion annually, the AMA estimated.</p>
<p>Physician billing and practice management companies have had to implement new tools and techniques to insure that their clients done feel the effects of this insurance industry trend.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://anesres.com/billing-collections/health-insurance-claims-processing-errors-on-the-rise/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How to Bill for Anesthesia for an Emergency of Short Duration</title>
		<link>http://anesres.com/reimbursement/how-to-bill-for-anesthesia-for-an-emergency-of-short-duration/</link>
		<comments>http://anesres.com/reimbursement/how-to-bill-for-anesthesia-for-an-emergency-of-short-duration/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 May 2011 16:00:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert Cox</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clinical Practices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CMS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reimbursement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[99140]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anesthesia billing emergency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anesthesia emergency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare emergency]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anesres.com/?p=1981</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was recently asked, &#8220;If one of my partners is medically directing a Medicare patient in OR #1 and an emergency C section needs to be performed on another patient because of fetal distress, is medical direction broken if the anesthesiologist begins the emergency case in OR #2 and remains there for 31 minutes, until… <a href="http://anesres.com/reimbursement/how-to-bill-for-anesthesia-for-an-emergency-of-short-duration/">Continue reading &#187;</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was recently asked, &#8220;<em>If one of my partners is medically directing a Medicare patient in OR #1 and an emergency C section needs to be performed on another patient because of fetal distress, is medical direction broken if the anesthesiologist begins the emergency case in OR #2 and remains there for 31 minutes, until an on-call CRNA relieves the anesthesiologist</em>?&#8221;</p>
<p>CMS muddied the waters by stating that the medically directing anesthesiologist may perform other duties concurrently (sometimes known as the “Six permissible sins” of medical direction). These duties include: <br /><strong></strong></p>
<ol>
<li><strong>Addressing an emergency of short duration in the immediate area</strong></li>
<li> Administering an epidural or caudal anesthetic to a patient in labor</li>
<li>Performing periodic, rather than continuous, monitoring of an obstetrical patient</li>
<li>Receiving patients entering the operating suite for the next surgery</li>
<li>Checking or discharging patients in the PACU</li>
<li>Coordinating scheduling matters</li>
</ol>
<p>The emergency case is clearly an emergency (CPT code 99140) and I think we can assume that OR #2 is in the immediate area. So what constitutes &#8220;a short duration&#8221;? My recommendation is to look at the expected on-call response time as your relative duration. Most anesthesia groups that utilize from-home, on-call for CRNAs, expect them to arrive within 30 minutes of being contacted (group policy statement). In the about example of the anesthesiologist starting the emergency C section and remaining in OR #2 for 31 minutes, would qualify for all three criteria and the case should be billed as medically directed and not subject to decreased reimbursement for broken medical direction (or supervision). My qualified opinion.</p>
<p>Anesthesia groups should use all resources available to them when faced with a situation that they have not encountered before. A few suggested resources  are:</p>
<ul>
<li>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;">check with their <em>fiscal intermediaries </em>for guidance</div>
</li>
<li>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;">post your situation on a respectable listserv so that <em>your colleagues </em>can share experiences</div>
</li>
<li>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;">contact <em>a consultant </em>that might have experience with this issue</div>
</li>
</ul>
<p> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://anesres.com/reimbursement/how-to-bill-for-anesthesia-for-an-emergency-of-short-duration/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>MedPAC Advises 1% Update for Physicians</title>
		<link>http://anesres.com/billing-collections/medpac-advises-1-update-for-physicians/</link>
		<comments>http://anesres.com/billing-collections/medpac-advises-1-update-for-physicians/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Mar 2011 19:17:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert Cox</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Billing & Collections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reimbursement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anesthesia billing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anesthesia reimbursement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MedPac]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anesres.com/?p=1913</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In its annual report to Congress, the Medicare Payment Advisory Commission (MedPAC) recommended a 1-percent payment update for the physican fee schedule services in 2012. MedPAC also recommended 1 percent updates in 2012 for outpatient dialysis centers, and hospice. For ambulatory surgical centers (ASCs), Congress should implement a 0.5 percent increase in calendar year 2012 while… <a href="http://anesres.com/billing-collections/medpac-advises-1-update-for-physicians/">Continue reading &#187;</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In its annual <a title="report" href="http://www.medpac.gov/documents/Mar11_FactSheet.pdf" target="_blank">report</a> to Congress, the Medicare Payment Advisory Commission (MedPAC) recommended a 1-percent payment update for the physican fee schedule services in 2012.</p>
<p>MedPAC also recommended 1 percent updates in 2012 for outpatient dialysis centers, and hospice. For ambulatory surgical centers (ASCs), Congress should implement a 0.5 percent increase in calendar year 2012 while requiring ASCs to submit cost and quality data. Skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) would get no update in fiscal year 2012, according to MedPAC, which also called for Congress to establish a quality incentive payment for SNFs and for SNFs to report more accurate diagnostic and service-use information. MedPAC criticized the amount of fraud that occurs in home health agencies and advised HHS to redesign how it pays for home healthcare. The Commission also recommends that HHS investigate financial relationships and patterns of referrals between nursing homes and hospice and asked Congress to change Medicare’s payment to hospice.</p>
<p>This means that the anesthesia rates will go up slightly in 2012.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://anesres.com/billing-collections/medpac-advises-1-update-for-physicians/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Top 10 Trends to Impact Anesthesia in 2011</title>
		<link>http://anesres.com/practice-management/top-10-trends-to-impact-anesthesia-in-2011/</link>
		<comments>http://anesres.com/practice-management/top-10-trends-to-impact-anesthesia-in-2011/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2011 16:56:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert Cox</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Anesthesia Market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hospital Partnership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Practice Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reimbursement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2011 anesthesia trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2011 healthcare trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2011 Trends to impact Anesthesia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anesres.com/?p=1871</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Camden Group predicts the following 10 trends will have an impact on the anesthesia sector and healthcare in general during 2011: Insurance membership will take a hit from slow recovery. Few unemployed will take advantage of COBRA while employees, faced with paying more of their health plan premium, will select high-deductible, low-premium PPO plans, hurting HMOs. No… <a href="http://anesres.com/practice-management/top-10-trends-to-impact-anesthesia-in-2011/">Continue reading &#187;</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Camden Group predicts the following 10 trends will have an impact on the anesthesia sector and healthcare in general during 2011:</p>
<ol>
<li><strong>Insurance membership will take a hit from slow recovery</strong>. Few unemployed will take advantage of COBRA while employees, faced with paying more of their health plan premium, will select high-deductible, low-premium PPO plans, hurting HMOs.</li>
<li><strong>No easing on payment pressure</strong>. Although health plan payments will keep pace with inflation and operating cost increases, they will not make up for declining or stagnant Medicaid and Medicare payments.</li>
<li><strong>Patients will postpone care, hurting providers</strong>. With high unemployment and underemployment and increased out-of-pocket costs, people will continue to put off treatment, keeping volumes soft at hospitals, ambulatory centers and physician offices.</li>
<li><strong>Cost is king</strong>. Soft volume, downward pressure on revenues and a deteriorating payer mix with increased bad debt will drive providers to seek more cost savings. However, unions, staffing ratios and regulations will make those cuts difficult. At the same time, health plans will begin to explore and increase the use of tiered networks and stratified payments to encourage use of lower-cost providers.</li>
<li><strong>Capital remains elusive</strong>. As in 2010, most non-profit hospitals will find it difficult to access capital. Lenders are requiring an increase in days cash-on-hand, coverage ratio, stronger EBITDA and smaller borrowings. Credit rating agencies want to see: 1) physician alignment strategy, 2) clinical integration and cost reduction action, 3) an IT plan, and 4) plans to capture more market share.</li>
<li><strong>Physicians will make or break new care models</strong>. To improve outcomes and lower costs, hospitals and medical groups will focus on accountable care, bundled payments, patient-centered medical homes and/or clinical integration. Reducing variation in care – primarily by physicians – will be central to any successful strategy. An effective bundled payment strategy, for example, requires specialists to address clinical resource consumption and supply cost and use while standardizing care protocols in conjunction with hospitalists and intensivists.</li>
<li><strong>Construction focus is on fast returns</strong>. Construction projects will be scaled down, with a focus on regulatory compliance, enhancing throughput, improving care/outcomes and, if possible, capturing additional market share. Providers also will prioritize construction that generates superior returns, such as surgical services and imaging centers. It won&#8217;t be surprising to see the growth of freestanding emergency departments to reduce the need for hospitals, increase access and provide capacity for the newly insured.</li>
<li><strong>IT becomes more pervasive – or else</strong>. Information technology underpins providers&#8217; ability to shift to new care models, so IT moves to center stage with efforts to implement electronic medical records, computerized physician order entry and health information exchanges – provided, of course, medical facilities already have in place e-prescribing, PACS and online results reporting and scheduling.</li>
<li><strong>Let&#8217;s make a deal</strong>. Mergers and acquisitions will be brisk as more hospitals and physician groups acknowledge they lack the resources to invest in information technology, facilities and equipment for new delivery models or the leverage to negotiate effectively with health plans. Given their central role in new models, the value of primary care medical groups will increase. It&#8217;s possible that health plans will enter the market to acquire these medical groups.</li>
<li><strong>Market share, market share, market share</strong>. Hospitals and medical groups have underused assets and must get them busy. Providers also realize that more volume will generate incremental revenue and decrease per unit cost. Hospitals will hunt for new programs to fill empty or underperforming assets.</li>
</ol>
<p>January 11, 2011 | Molly Merrill, Contributing Editor for The Camden Group</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://anesres.com/practice-management/top-10-trends-to-impact-anesthesia-in-2011/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Strategy Aims To Ensure Postoperative Evaluations</title>
		<link>http://anesres.com/reimbursement/new-strategy-aims-to-ensure-postoperative-evaluations/</link>
		<comments>http://anesres.com/reimbursement/new-strategy-aims-to-ensure-postoperative-evaluations/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2010 16:50:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert Cox</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clinical Practices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CMS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reimbursement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HHS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OIG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[post-operative evaluations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anesres.com/?p=1401</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From Anesthesia News, October issue by Lynne Peeples Despite regulatory guidelines that require them, postoperative anesthesia evaluations are often neglected. Ambiguity may arise over which clinician is responsible or patients simply may be hard to track down—either having been discharged without an overnight stay or detained in the physical therapy or radiology departments. However, a new… <a href="http://anesres.com/reimbursement/new-strategy-aims-to-ensure-postoperative-evaluations/">Continue reading &#187;</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From Anesthesia News, October issue by Lynne Peeples</p>
<p>Despite regulatory guidelines that require them, postoperative anesthesia evaluations are often neglected. Ambiguity may arise over which clinician is responsible or patients simply may be hard to track down—either having been discharged without an overnight stay or detained in the physical therapy or radiology departments.</p>
<p>However, a new approach involving an electronic database and a designated resident may help ensure that the potential timesaving, cost-saving and lifesaving evaluations are actually performed. The study is scheduled to be presented at the 2010 annual meeting of the American Society of Anesthesiologists in San Diego (abstract 1307).</p>
<p><a title="Anesthesia News October Issue by Lynne Peeples" href="http://www.anesthesiologynews.com/index.asp?section_id=1&amp;show=dept&amp;ses=ogst&amp;issue_id=669&amp;article_id=15887" target="_blank">To read the full article Click Here.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://anesres.com/reimbursement/new-strategy-aims-to-ensure-postoperative-evaluations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CMS Changes Conditions of Participation (CoP) for Anesthesia Services Part 1 of 4</title>
		<link>http://anesres.com/reimbursement/cms-changes-conditions-of-participation-cop-for-anesthesia-services-part-1-of-4/</link>
		<comments>http://anesres.com/reimbursement/cms-changes-conditions-of-participation-cop-for-anesthesia-services-part-1-of-4/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 15:13:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert Cox</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CMS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reimbursement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conditions of Participation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CoP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anesres.com/?p=1324</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) recently revised the Conditions of Participation (CoP) for anesthesia services which is outlined in Transmittal 59 dated May 21, 2010. This four (4) part blog post outlines the major compliance challenges associated with the new CoP and solutions to help hospitals assess vulnerabilities in anesthesia and sedation services.… <a href="http://anesres.com/reimbursement/cms-changes-conditions-of-participation-cop-for-anesthesia-services-part-1-of-4/">Continue reading &#187;</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) recently revised the Conditions of Participation (CoP) for anesthesia services which is outlined in <a href="http://www.asahq.org/Washington/UpdatedCMSIGs5-21-10.pdf">Transmittal 59</a> dated May 21, 2010. This four (4) part blog post outlines the major compliance challenges associated with the new CoP and solutions to help hospitals assess vulnerabilities in anesthesia and sedation services.</p>
<p>The revised guidance added a significant amount of new language to the old guidelines. In summary, the revised language addresses the following four (4) areas:</p>
<ol>
<li><strong>Types of Anesthesia Services</strong>: The revised guidance provides definitions of the various types of anesthesia related services (i.e. general anesthesia, regional anesthesia, monitored anesthesia, topical/local anesthesia, minimal sedation, moderate sedation) and indicates whether they involve the administration of “anesthesia”. </li>
<li><strong>Administration/Supervision Requirements</strong>: The revisions provide additional guidance regarding who may administer anesthesia and the supervision requirements of non-physician personnel, specifically Certified Registered Nurse Anesthetists (“CRNAs”). </li>
<li><strong>Pre and Post anesthesia evaluations</strong>: The revisions refine the interpretive guidelines by explaining the requirements for pre and post anesthesia evaluations. </li>
<li><strong>Intra-operative Reports</strong>: The guidance indicates the minimum elements required under the current standard of care for an anesthesia intra-operative report or record. </li>
</ol>
<h3>Part 1: Defining Anesthesia and Related Services</h3>
<p>The new changes clearly define both anesthesia and sedation, borrowing from definitions found in the American Society of Anesthesiologists’ (ASA) most recent set of practice guidelines (Anesthesiology 2002; 96:1004-17), summarized here:</p>
<ul>
<li>Anesthesia involves the administration of a medication to produce a blunting or loss of pain, voluntary and involuntary movement, autonomic function, and memory and/or consciousness. </li>
<li>Patients often require assistance in maintaining a patient airway, or correcting depressed spontaneous ventilation due to drug-induced depression of neuromuscular function. </li>
<li>Cardiovascular function may be impaired. </li>
<li>Anesthesia is used for those procedures when loss of consciousness is required for the safe and effective delivery of surgical services.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Monitored Anesthesia Care</strong> (MAC) includes the monitoring of the patient by a practitioner who is qualified to administer anesthesia. Deep sedation/analgesia is included in MAC.</p>
<ul>
<li>In Deep Sedation/Analgesia, patients cannot be easily aroused but respond purposefully following repeated or painful stimulation. </li>
<li>The ability for the patient to independently maintain breathing function may be impaired. </li>
<li>Patients may require assistance maintaining an airway, spontaneous ventilation may be inadequate. </li>
<li>Cardiovascular function is usually maintained. </li>
<li>Deep sedation/analgesia includes the use of propofol.</li>
<li>Must be delivered or supervised by a practitioner as specified in 42 CFR 482.52(a). </li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Regional Anesthesia</strong> is the delivery of anesthetic medication at a specific level of the spinal cord and/or to peripheral nerves used when loss of consciousness is not desired, but sufficient analgesia and loss of voluntary and involuntary movement is required.</p>
<ul>
<li>Regional anesthesia includes epidurals, spinals and other central neuraxial nerve blocks.</li>
<li>Given the potential for the conversion and extension of regional to general anesthesia in certain procedures, administration of regional and general anesthesia must be delivered or supervised by a practitioner as specified at 42 CFR 482.52(a). </li>
<li>Epidural or spinal route for the purpose of analgesia—during labor and delivery—is not considered anesthesia, and therefore it is not subject to the anesthesia supervision requirements.</li>
<li>If C-section is necessary, anesthesia supervision requirements would apply (42 CFR 482.52(a)).</li>
</ul>
<p>In contrast, the new CoP also outline those services not subject to the anesthesia administration and supervision requirements (42 CFR 482.52(a)):</p>
<p><strong>Topical or Local Anesthesia or Minimal Sedation </strong><strong>in which:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Patients respond normally to verbal commands. </li>
<li>Although cognitive function and coordination may be impaired, ventilation and/or cardiovascular functions are unaffected. </li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Moderate Sedation/Analgesia </strong>(“Conscious Sedation”) in which:</p>
<ul>
<li>Patients respond purposefully to verbal commands, either alone or accompanied by light tactile stimulation. </li>
<li>No interventions are required to maintain a patient airway. </li>
<li>Spontaneous ventilation is adequate. </li>
<li>Cardiovascular function is usually maintained. </li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Rescue Capacity </strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Hospitals are required to ensure that procedures are in place to rescue patients whose level of sedation becomes deeper than initially intended.</li>
<li>Intervention by a practitioner with expertise in airway management and advanced life support is required. </li>
<li>The qualified practitioner corrects the adverse physiologic consequences of the deeper-than-intended level of sedation and returns the patient to the originally intended level of sedation. </li>
</ul>
<p><em><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><span style="color: #0000ff;">Tips for Compliance</span></span></strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;"> </span></em></p>
<p><em><span style="color: #0000ff;">To comply with this section of the regulations, changes in policies and practices may be necessary. Assuring that all areas have been addressed is the only way of avoiding violations on future surveys. Begin by assuring that the following items have been established in policy and practice:</span></em></p>
<ul>
<li><em><span style="color: #0000ff;">Align the definitions for anesthesia and sedation with those supported by CMS and ASA.</span></em></li>
<li><em><span style="color: #0000ff;">Define where the different levels of anesthesia can occur and under what circumstances. </span></em></li>
<li><em><span style="color: #0000ff;">Evaluate the level of compliance with the requirements at each location where anesthesia and sedation is administered. </span></em></li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://anesres.com/reimbursement/cms-changes-conditions-of-participation-cop-for-anesthesia-services-part-1-of-4/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CMS Delivers Additional Information Regarding Medicare Timely Filing Rule</title>
		<link>http://anesres.com/billing-collections/cms-delivers-additional-information-regarding-medicare-timely-filing-rule/</link>
		<comments>http://anesres.com/billing-collections/cms-delivers-additional-information-regarding-medicare-timely-filing-rule/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2010 13:44:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert Cox</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Billing & Collections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CMS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reimbursement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anesres.com/?p=1298</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the MLN Matters dated July 30, 2010, Change Request (CR) 7080, CMS gives additional instructions on the timely filing rule: For professional claims (CMS-1500 Form and 837P) submitted by physicians and other suppliers that include span dates of service, the line item“From” date will be used to determine the date of service and filing… <a href="http://anesres.com/billing-collections/cms-delivers-additional-information-regarding-medicare-timely-filing-rule/">Continue reading &#187;</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the MLN Matters dated July 30, 2010, Change Request (CR) 7080, CMS gives additional instructions on the timely filing rule:</p>
<ul>
<li>For <strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">professional claims </span></strong>(CMS-1500 Form and 837P) submitted by physicians and other suppliers that include span dates of service, the line item<strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">“From” date will be used to determine the date of service and filing timeliness.</span></strong> (This includes supplies and rental items).  For physicians and other suppliers that bill claims with span dates, <strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">these span date services cannot exceed one month. </span></strong><strong></strong></li>
<li>For <strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">institutional claims</span></strong> that include span dates of service (i.e., a “From” and “Through” date span on the claim), the <strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">“Through” date on the claim will be used to determine the date of service for claims filing timeliness.</span></strong></li>
<li>BE AWARE: If a line item “From” date is not timely, but the “To” date is timely, Medicare contractors will split the line item and deny untimely services as not timely filed.</li>
<li>Claims having a date of service of February 29th must be filed by February 28th of the following year to be considered as timely filed. If the date of service is February 29th of any year and is received on or after March 1st of the following year, the claim will be denied as having failed to meet the timely filing requirement.</li>
</ul>
<p>Change request (CR) 6960 specified the basic timely filing standards established for FFS reimbursement, which are a result of Section 6404 of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 (ACA) that states that claims with dates of service on or after January 1, 2010, received later than one calendar year beyond the date of service will be denied by Medicare.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://anesres.com/billing-collections/cms-delivers-additional-information-regarding-medicare-timely-filing-rule/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced

Served from: anesres.com @ 2012-05-21 05:06:30 -->
