<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Anesthesia Billing and Practice Management &#124; Anesthesia Resources &#187; Practice Management</title>
	<atom:link href="http://anesres.com/category/practice-management/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://anesres.com</link>
	<description>We get the job done. Our efforts go beyond industry standards and benchmarks.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 18:11:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Kentucky Opts Out of Federal Manadate for CRNAs</title>
		<link>http://anesres.com/practice-management/anesthesia-market/kentucky-opts-out-of-federal-manadate-for-crnas/</link>
		<comments>http://anesres.com/practice-management/anesthesia-market/kentucky-opts-out-of-federal-manadate-for-crnas/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 18:11:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert Cox</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Anesthesia Market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clinical Practices]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anesres.com/?p=2490</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Kentucky Gov. Steve Beshear announced Friday that the state will exempt hospitals and ambulatory surgery centers from the federal requirement that certified nurse anesthetists must be supervised by a physician when administering anesthesia.  The change is a necessary step in improving access to care in rural and underserved areas of the state, Mr. Beshear said… <a href="http://anesres.com/practice-management/anesthesia-market/kentucky-opts-out-of-federal-manadate-for-crnas/">Continue reading &#187;</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kentucky Gov. Steve Beshear <a href="http://www.kypressnewsservice.com/public/story1.php?id=1335532868" target="_blank">announced </a>Friday that the state will exempt hospitals and ambulatory surgery centers from the federal requirement that certified nurse anesthetists must be supervised by a physician when administering anesthesia.  </p>
<p>The change is a necessary step in improving access to care in rural and underserved areas of the state, Mr. Beshear said in a statement. &#8220;In cases like this, where the federal requirement is an obstacle to some of the best options for delivery of high-quality health care, we&#8217;re pleased to take this step to opt out,&#8221; he said.<br />The Kentucky Society of Anesthesiologists is opposing the opt-out. &#8220;An opt-out would have dangerous ramifications to the patients of Kentucky and jeopardize Kentucky&#8217;s ability to deliver quality medical care,&#8221; a KSA press release said.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://anesres.com/practice-management/anesthesia-market/kentucky-opts-out-of-federal-manadate-for-crnas/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Anesthesiologist Are Happier than the Average Physician</title>
		<link>http://anesres.com/practice-management/anesthesia-market/anesthesiologist-are-happier-than-the-average-physician/</link>
		<comments>http://anesres.com/practice-management/anesthesia-market/anesthesiologist-are-happier-than-the-average-physician/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 18:03:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert Cox</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Anesthesia Market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clinical Practices]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anesres.com/?p=2486</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Medscape asked U.S. physicians how happy they were with their lives outside of medicine and to rate their level of happiness on a scale of 1 to 5, with 1 being the least happy and 5 being the happiest.  Anesthesiologists had an average happiness score of 4.0, which was higher than the average physician response… <a href="http://anesres.com/practice-management/anesthesia-market/anesthesiologist-are-happier-than-the-average-physician/">Continue reading &#187;</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><a href="http://www.medscape.com/sites/public/lifestyle/2012" target="_blank">Medscape</a> asked U.S. physicians how happy they were with their lives outside of medicine and to rate their level of happiness on a scale of 1 to 5, with 1 being the least happy and 5 being the happiest.  Anesthesiologists had an average happiness score of 4.0, which was higher than the average physician response of 3.96. <br /><strong></strong></div>
<div><strong>Anesthesiologists&#8217; Top 5 Pastimes</strong><br />1.    Exercise/physical activity</div>
<div>2.    Travel</div>
<div>3.    Reading</div>
<div>4.    Food and wine</div>
<div>5.    Cultural events (movies, theater, museums) <strong> </strong></div>
<div><strong></strong> </div>
<div><strong>Anesthesiologists&#8217; Political Leanings</strong><br />Fiscally conservative/socially liberal: 44%</div>
<div>Fiscally conservative/socially conservative: 42%</div>
<div>Fiscally liberal/socially liberal: 11%<br /><strong></strong></div>
<div><strong>Anesthesiologists&#8217; Top 5 Vacation Spots </strong></div>
<div>1.    Foreign travel</div>
<div>2.    Beach vacation</div>
<div>3.    Cruises</div>
<div>4.    Vacation home</div>
<div>5.    Road trips<br /><strong></strong></div>
<div><strong>Anesthesiologists&#8217; Marital Status</strong><br />Married: 82 percent</div>
<div>Divorced or separated: 6.83 percent</div>
<div>Single and living alone: 6.5 percent <strong> </strong></div>
<div><strong></strong> </div>
<div><strong>Anesthesiologists&#8217; Physical Health</strong><br />Anesthesiologists were asked to rate their physical health, on a scale from 1 to 5. <br />Age 31-40: 4.11</div>
<div>Age 41-50: 4.22</div>
<div>Age 51-60: 4.12</div>
<div>Age 61-70: 4.09</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://anesres.com/practice-management/anesthesia-market/anesthesiologist-are-happier-than-the-average-physician/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Are ACOs Really About Quality?</title>
		<link>http://anesres.com/practice-management/are-acos-really-about-quality/</link>
		<comments>http://anesres.com/practice-management/are-acos-really-about-quality/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 13:57:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert Cox</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Practice Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ACO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[collaboration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obamacare]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anesres.com/?p=2457</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When the subject of accountable care organizations first comes to mind, the common context is that of the ACO as a Medicare payment mechanism introduced as an element of Obamacare. However, to fully understand the economics of an ACO, you need to appreciate the fact that the model is not designed to be constrained to the Medicare arena. And, in fact, the economics of the creation of a functional ACO dictate that it must focus on a larger market. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When the subject of accountable care organizations first comes to mind, the common context is that of the ACO as a Medicare payment mechanism introduced as an element of Obamacare. However, to fully understand the economics of an ACO, you need to appreciate the fact that the model is not designed to be constrained to the Medicare arena. And, in fact, the economics of the creation of a functional ACO dictate that it must focus on a larger market. <span id="more-2457"></span></p>
<p>ACO formation is both capital and time intensive. By way of limited example only, there&#8217;s the legal and financial work in planning the structure, creation of the necessary entities, building the management and compensation structures, and developing relationships with physicians and convincing them, cajoling them, or even outright pressuring them to join.</p>
<p> Given these high transaction costs &#8211; and once again, setting aside (at least for a few nanoseconds) the thoughts of shifting power and control &#8212; hospitals that create ACO structures will be predisposed to use them other than simply for purposes of chasing Medicare dollars: They will pursue private payer dollars as well.</p>
<p> Physicians who become providers in an ACO believing that what is intended is simply another way of collecting and allocating Medicare dollars will soon find that a huge proportion of their entire book of business is now ACO business. If that is indeed the case, then it will functionally be as if you have one very large, or perhaps one sole, payor: the hospital. When that happens, will you still be running an independent practice?</p>
<p>Of course, this has significant economic implications for your financial future. It also has significant political implications vis-à-vis the medical staff: If all physicians are dependent upon the hospital for their livelihood, how independent can the medical staff ever be?</p>
<p>And, remember, that the reason &#8211; or excuse &#8211; that the model&#8217;s proponents use for the creation of an ACO is a drive to quality care. But if physician practice becomes more and more subject to the economic control of the hospital, what will happen to physicians&#8217; satisfaction with medical practice and, therefore, with the quality of care that they give, even assuming every physician has patient care at the forefront of his or her thoughts?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://anesres.com/practice-management/are-acos-really-about-quality/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CMS proposes one-year delay for ICD-10</title>
		<link>http://anesres.com/practice-management/cms-proposes-one-year-delay-for-icd-10/</link>
		<comments>http://anesres.com/practice-management/cms-proposes-one-year-delay-for-icd-10/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2012 19:42:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert Cox</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Practice Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CMS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[icd10]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anesres.com/?p=2455</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) published a rule that proposes to delay ICD-10 one year from Oct. 2013 to Oct. 2014. The rule also includes a proposal to implement a national health plan identifier, required under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 (ACA). This is a great step… <a href="http://anesres.com/practice-management/cms-proposes-one-year-delay-for-icd-10/">Continue reading &#187;</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) published a <a href="http://www.mmsend2.com/link.cfm?r=89022240&amp;sid=18409415&amp;m=1896756&amp;u=MGMA&amp;j=9769717&amp;s=http://www.mgma.com/WorkArea/DownloadAsset.aspx?id=1370502&amp;ecid=8579&amp;kc=wac">rule</a> that proposes to delay ICD-10 one year from Oct. 2013 to Oct. 2014.</p>
<p>The rule also includes a proposal to implement a national health plan identifier, required under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 (ACA). This is a great step to help standize the health plans so that they can be uniquily identified, just like providers have been for years now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://anesres.com/practice-management/cms-proposes-one-year-delay-for-icd-10/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Additional Increase in Medicare Anesthesia Conversion Factor Applicable to All 2012 Claims</title>
		<link>http://anesres.com/practice-management/additional-increase-in-medicare-anesthesia-conversion-factor-applicable-to-all-2012-claims/</link>
		<comments>http://anesres.com/practice-management/additional-increase-in-medicare-anesthesia-conversion-factor-applicable-to-all-2012-claims/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2012 19:28:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert Cox</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Practice Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CMS conversion factor 2012]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anesres.com/?p=2450</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Through ongoing discussions between ASA and the Centers for Medicare &#38; Medicaid Services (CMS), ASA has clarified that the previously announced changes to the Medicare anesthesia conversion factor resulted from an error in the original calculations of the CY 2012 Anesthesia Conversion Factor.  CMS has instructed its contractors to update their claims processing files to… <a href="http://anesres.com/practice-management/additional-increase-in-medicare-anesthesia-conversion-factor-applicable-to-all-2012-claims/">Continue reading &#187;</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Through ongoing discussions between ASA and the Centers for Medicare &amp; Medicaid Services (CMS), ASA has clarified that the previously announced changes to the Medicare anesthesia conversion factor resulted from an error in the original calculations of the CY 2012 Anesthesia Conversion Factor.  CMS has instructed its contractors to update their claims processing files to use the updated locale-specific conversion factors by March 15, 2012.  Claims paid using the originally published conversion factors will not be automatically reprocessed; contractors will reprocess such claims brought to their attention. </p>
<div>
<p><strong>ASA members are highly encouraged to analyze their Medicare claims activity for January 1, 2012 through March 14, 2012.  If increased revenue offsets the administrative costs, they should request reprocessing of Medicare claims for this time frame. </strong></p>
<p>The updated locale &#8211; specific conversion factors are all slightly greater than the originally published figures.  The increases range from $0.08 to $0.13 per unit which corresponds to an additional increase of 0.42 percent to 0.59 percent above the originally posted figures for 2012. </p>
<p>For a locale-specific comparison, <a href="/~/media/For Members/Practice Management/2012 Medicare Locality Specific Anesthesia CFs.ashx">click here</a>.</p>
<p>With this revision, the total increase in the unadjusted anesthesia conversion factor from CY 2011 to CY 2012 is 2.0 percent.</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://anesres.com/practice-management/additional-increase-in-medicare-anesthesia-conversion-factor-applicable-to-all-2012-claims/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Supreme Court Start Hearings on PPACA</title>
		<link>http://anesres.com/practice-management/supreme-court-start-hearings-on-ppaca/</link>
		<comments>http://anesres.com/practice-management/supreme-court-start-hearings-on-ppaca/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2012 21:17:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert Cox</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Practice Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PPACA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme court hearing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anesres.com/?p=2446</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Beginning March 26, the U.S. Supreme Court will hear six hours of oral arguments spread out over three days regarding the constitutionality of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) and its provisions. In November, the court agreed to hear the lawsuit brought forth by 26 states, the National Federation of Independent Business (NFIB)… <a href="http://anesres.com/practice-management/supreme-court-start-hearings-on-ppaca/">Continue reading &#187;</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Beginning March 26, the <a href="http://www.supremecourt.gov/" shape="rect">U.S. Supreme Court</a> will hear six hours of oral arguments spread out over three days regarding the constitutionality of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) and its provisions.</p>
<p>In November, the court agreed to hear the lawsuit brought forth by 26 states, the National Federation of Independent Business (NFIB) and two individuals. The main issue at hand and the subject of the lawsuit is the claim that Congress exceeded its constitutional power by instituting the “individual mandate,” sometimes called the “minimum coverage provision,” which requires that most Americans buy health insurance starting in 2014 or face a fiscal penalty.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://anesres.com/practice-management/supreme-court-start-hearings-on-ppaca/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>28 States Awarded Insurance Exchange Grants</title>
		<link>http://anesres.com/practice-management/28-states-awarded-insurance-exchange-grants/</link>
		<comments>http://anesres.com/practice-management/28-states-awarded-insurance-exchange-grants/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2012 13:00:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert Cox</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Practice Management]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anesres.com/?p=2406</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Department of Health and Human Services has awarded insurance-exchange establishment grants to 28 states, and several states have applied for grants that are expected to be awarded in February, according to a new report detailing how states are establishing the exchanges. According to the report, which summarizes actions taken by 10 states to establish… <a href="http://anesres.com/practice-management/28-states-awarded-insurance-exchange-grants/">Continue reading &#187;</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Department of Health and Human Services has awarded insurance-exchange establishment grants to 28 states, and several states have applied for grants that are expected to be awarded in February, according to a <a title="new report " href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/01-18-12_exchange_report.pdf" target="_blank">new report </a>detailing how states are establishing the exchanges.</p>
<p>According to the report, which summarizes actions taken by 10 states to establish health insurance exchanges, officials in New Hampshire, Wyoming, Alaska and Wyoming are likely to pursue insurance exchanges in 2012.</p>
<p>HHS has awarded $729.5 million in planning grants, establishment grants, and innovator grants, according to the report. The agency said it is continuing efforts to develop a federal exchange for states that do not choose to create their own exchanges and will issue guidance in the coming months.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://anesres.com/practice-management/28-states-awarded-insurance-exchange-grants/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Six Providers Seek ACO Accreditation From NCQA</title>
		<link>http://anesres.com/practice-management/six-providers-seek-aco-accreditation-from-ncqa/</link>
		<comments>http://anesres.com/practice-management/six-providers-seek-aco-accreditation-from-ncqa/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 15:52:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert Cox</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Practice Management]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anesres.com/?p=2396</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Washington, DC—Six provider-based entities are the first aspiring accountable care organizations (ACOs) to seek accreditation from the National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA) under the ACO Accreditation program NCQA launched in November. The six early adopters are:   Billings Clinic, Billings, MT  • Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA • Crystal Run Healthcare, Middletown, NY • Essentia… <a href="http://anesres.com/practice-management/six-providers-seek-aco-accreditation-from-ncqa/">Continue reading &#187;</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Washington, DC—Six provider-based entities are the first aspiring accountable care organizations (ACOs) to seek accreditation from the National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA) under the ACO Accreditation program NCQA launched in November. The six early adopters are:  <br /> <a href="http://www.billingsclinic.com/">Billings Clinic</a>, Billings, MT  • <a href="http://www.chop.edu/">Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia</a>, Philadelphia, PA • <a href="http://www.crystalrunhealthcare.com/">Crystal Run Healthcare</a>, Middletown, NY • <a href="http://www.essentiahealth.org/">Essentia Health</a>, Duluth, MN • <a href="http://www.healthpartners.com/public">HealthPartners</a>, Minneapolis, MN • <a href="http://www.kelsey-seybold.com/">Kelsey-Seybold Clinic</a>, Houston, TX<br />The early–adopter designation means these organizations have committed to undergoing a full NCQA survey of their ACO capabilities between March 1 and December 31, 2012.  Benefits of being an early adopter include independent assessment of an organization’s readiness to be an ACO. Organizations that earn accreditation may have extra credibility and first-mover advantages in their local markets. Being an early adopter of ACO accreditation may also help an organization become eligible to participate in demonstration projects or pilot programs that public and private health plans sponsor.  “I applaud these organizations for having the courage to go first and measure themselves against objective, balanced standards of ACO readiness,” said NCQA President Margaret E. O’Kane. “Volunteering for this evaluation is the first step to showing payers and providers how well they can do the things ACOs are expected to do.” ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://anesres.com/practice-management/six-providers-seek-aco-accreditation-from-ncqa/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Top 10 Government Issues for Practices to Watch Out for in 2012</title>
		<link>http://anesres.com/practice-management/top-10-government-issues-for-practices-to-watch-out-for-in-2012/</link>
		<comments>http://anesres.com/practice-management/top-10-government-issues-for-practices-to-watch-out-for-in-2012/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 23:16:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert Cox</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Practice Management]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anesres.com/?p=2378</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As 2012 gets underway, here are the top government issues that will impact medical groups this year. For more details on each item, read the full version of the top 10 government issues list for 2012. Medicare payments remain in flux -  Congress  left Washington late last year after only passing a two month fix for the flawed… <a href="http://anesres.com/practice-management/top-10-government-issues-for-practices-to-watch-out-for-in-2012/">Continue reading &#187;</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://anesres.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/top-ten2011.jpg"><img class="alignright size-thumbnail wp-image-2386" title="top-ten2011" src="http://anesres.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/top-ten2011-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a>As 2012 gets underway, here are the top government issues that will impact medical groups this year. For more details on each item, read the <a href="http://www.mmsend2.com/link.cfm?r=89022240&amp;sid=17144483&amp;m=1713620&amp;u=MGMA&amp;j=8573876&amp;s=http://www.mgma.com/article.aspx?id=1369438">full version of the top 10 government issues list for 2012</a>.</p>
<ol>
<li><strong>Medicare payments remain in flux - </strong><strong> </strong>Congress  left Washington late last year after only passing a two month fix for the flawed sustainable growth rate (SGR) formula, despite the fact that they had a full year to address the 2012 cuts. Congress’s inability to avert the 27.4 percent cut for a full year exacerbates uncertainty for physician  payment in 2012.</li>
<li><strong>Version 5010 transition - </strong>Jan. 1 was the compliance deadline to use Version 5010 standards for electronic claims and other HIPAA transactions. MGMA research indicated that some practice trading partners, including practice management system vendors and health plans, were not able to meet the deadline.</li>
<li><strong>E-prescribing  penalties begin in 2012 - </strong>A 1% penalty will be levied in 2012 for physicians who are eligible for the Medicare e-prescribing program and did not successfully e-prescribe in 2011 or have a hardship exemption request approved by the Centers for Medicare &amp; Medicaid Services (CMS). E-prescribing penalties increase to 1.5 % in 2013 and to 2.0% in 2014.</li>
<li><strong>Countdown to ICD-10 - </strong>The healthcare industry has been focused on transitioning to HIPAA Version 5010 electronic transaction standards, but 5010 is only a stepping stone to implement ICD-10, the new diagnosis code set. The industry must transition from ICD-9 to ICD-10 by Oct. 1, 2013. This new code set is vastly more complex.</li>
<li><strong>2012 elections - </strong>Campaigns are underway for the 2012 elections, which could change the political landscape for the next four years and have a significant impact on health policy, including repeal or further implementation of healthcare reform.</li>
<li><strong>Continued emphasis on compliance - </strong>Both  Congress and CMS continue to focus on curbing fraud, waste and abuse in public health programs, such as Medicare and Medicaid. Medicare recovers more than $7 for every $1 spent on fraud investigations, according to government data. Group practices should be prepared for new compliance initiatives.</li>
<li><strong>The Supreme Court hearing on ACA - </strong>Justices will hear challenges to the constitutionality of the 2010 healthcare reform bill, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA).</li>
<li><strong>CMS explores alternative payment models</strong> - The Center for Medicare &amp; Medicaid Innovation (CMMI) and CMS continue to explore payment models that move away from the current fee-for-service reimbursement method.</li>
<li><strong>Focus on site of service payment differentials - </strong>The Medicare Payment Advisory Commission and Congress are taking a closer look at payment differences for identical services across delivery settings, including the difference between payments made to hospitals and physician practices.       </li>
<li><strong>EHR meaningful use incentives continue - </strong>The  second year of the Medicare EHR incentive program is important because  2012 is the last year that physicians can start participating and earn the maximum amount of $44,000 over five years per eligible professional.</li>
</ol>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://anesres.com/practice-management/top-10-government-issues-for-practices-to-watch-out-for-in-2012/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is Your Billing Service Ready for 5010? It&#8217;s Your Cash Flow!</title>
		<link>http://anesres.com/practice-management/is-your-billing-service-ready-for-5010-its-your-cash-flow/</link>
		<comments>http://anesres.com/practice-management/is-your-billing-service-ready-for-5010-its-your-cash-flow/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2011 16:14:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert Cox</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Practice Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[5010 converson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[5010 implementation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[5010 standards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anesres.com/?p=2345</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As part of the change to the 5010 version of the HIPAA transaction standards starting in 2012, practices will no longer be permitted to use a PO box or lock box address as the “billing provider” address to receive payments. For electronic claims, a street address or physical location is required as the billing provider… <a href="http://anesres.com/practice-management/is-your-billing-service-ready-for-5010-its-your-cash-flow/">Continue reading &#187;</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://anesres.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/sign-success-failure.gif"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-2358" title="sign success failure" src="http://anesres.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/sign-success-failure-300x199.gif" alt="" width="171" height="133" /></a>As part of the change to the 5010 version of the HIPAA transaction standards starting in 2012, practices will no longer be permitted to use a PO box or lock box address as the “billing provider” address to receive payments. For electronic claims, a street address or physical location is required as the billing provider address. The Centers for Medicare &amp; Medicaid Services (CMS) report that the PO box issue is one of the leading causes of test claim rejections. CMS has indicated it will reject Medicare claims that continue to<br />report a PO box in the billing provider address field.  </p>
<p>Under HIPAA, all physicians and other healthcare providers that submit claims electronically are required to transition to the Version 5010 transactions by Jan. 1, 2012. Practices that wish to continue having payments sent to a PO box or lock box must report this address in the “pay-to” address field.</p>
<p>Practice administrators should ensure that their practice management system vendor, billing service or clearinghouse has made this change. Practices must update their address information before Jan. 1 to prevent claims rejections and interruptions in cash flow.  Commercial payer are implementing the 5010 standards as well, so be ready to trouble shot the commercial payers claims denials or prepare for a significant cash flow impact.</p>
<p>Visit <a href="http://www.mmsend2.com/link.cfm?r=89022240&amp;sid=16410366&amp;m=1616632&amp;u=MGMA&amp;j=7905760&amp;s=http://www.mgma.com/5010">mgma.com/5010</a> or the <a href="http://www.mmsend2.com/link.cfm?r=89022240&amp;sid=16410367&amp;m=1616632&amp;u=MGMA&amp;j=7905760&amp;s=http://www.cms.gov/Versions5010andD0">CMS Web site</a> for more information on the change to Version 5010.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://anesres.com/practice-management/is-your-billing-service-ready-for-5010-its-your-cash-flow/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced

Served from: anesres.com @ 2012-05-21 05:05:22 -->
